Funds / ETFs / Scheme 108479
Quantum Nifty 50 ETF
Quantum Mutual Fund · scheme code 108479 · ISIN INF082J01499
- Scheme code
- 108479
- Latest NAV
- ₹257.0644
- NAV date
- 22 Sep 2026
- Fund house
- Quantum Mutual Fund
Reading this dossier
Data, not advice. These pages show NAV history, category and computed returns as published by AMFI, so funds can be compared side by side. StockProof does not rank funds, does not score them, and does not recommend buying, selling or holding any of them. Past NAV movement is not an indication of future returns.
Fund names here are CURRENT names, not the name the fund had on the date shown. AMFI retroactively restates historical scheme names to whatever the fund is called today: its own April 2006 file lists schemes under "Nippon India Mutual Fund", a fund house that did not exist until 2019 (it was Reliance). Measured on 2026-08-29, all 1,947 scheme codes present in both AMFI's 2018 and 2026 files showed zero name changes — not because renames are rare in the Indian fund industry, but because the history is rewritten. StockProof stores and shows only the current name and does not attempt to reconstruct point-in-time names, because AMFI publishes nothing that would make that possible. The NAV figures themselves are as published for each date and are not restated.
Long-window returns are measured only over funds that still exist. Of the 1,790 scheme codes AMFI priced in April 2006, only 568 (31%) were still being priced in 2026. Funds that closed or merged are not in a long-period comparison, so any group of surviving funds looks better than the choice an investor actually faced at the time.
Benchmark, benchmark return and AUM figures on this page are AMFI's own published disclosure — the same SEBI-mandated benchmark every fund must declare and report against, sourced from AMFI's Fund Performance data. StockProof does not compute the benchmark return itself: it shows the number AMFI and the fund house publish, exactly as published. StockProof does not rank funds or benchmarks by this figure, and this is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.
This section is matched to the scheme above by FUND NAME, not by scheme code or ISIN — AMFI's benchmark-disclosure API carries neither, unlike its NAV files. Measured 2026-08-29 across the whole universe, this name match succeeds for about 86% of funds; most misses are small spelling or punctuation drift between AMFI's own two systems, not a wrong match — a fund with no match here simply shows no data rather than another fund's. One disclosed row also covers BOTH the Regular and Direct plan of a fund together, because that is the granularity AMFI itself publishes at — one level coarser than the per-plan scheme codes StockProof otherwise tracks.
Scheme
| Latest NAV | ₹257.0644 |
|---|---|
| NAV date | 22 Sep 2026 |
| Category | Other · Other ETF |
| Structure | Open Ended |
| Status | Open — priced in AMFI's latest file |
| As published by AMFI | Open Ended Schemes(Other Scheme - Other ETFs)
StockProof normalizes AMFI's 104 category spellings onto 56 categories; this is the raw string behind the one shown above. |
| Stored NAV history | 752 points, 01 Sep 2023 → 22 Sep 2026 |
Benchmark & AUM
| Benchmark | Nifty 50 TRI |
|---|---|
| Daily AUM | ₹63.73 Cr. |
| As of | 27 Aug 2026 |
| Riskometer — scheme | Very High |
| Riskometer — benchmark | Very High |
Fund vs benchmark
Regular and Direct are the plan's own trailing return; Benchmark is the same window's return on the declared benchmark above, as published by AMFI. A window is blank when AMFI has not published it for this fund, most often because the fund has not existed that long.
| Window | Regular | Direct | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year | -1.55% | — | -1.46% |
| 3 Year | 8.84% | — | 8.97% |
| 5 Year | 8.78% | — | 8.88% |
| 10 Year | 11.20% | — | 12.23% |
| Since launch | 10.97% | — | see below |
"Since launch" benchmark return is shown per plan, not as one column above — the Regular and Direct plan of a fund can launch on different dates, so each is benchmarked over its own window: Regular 11.50%, Direct —.
Exchange listing
This scheme is an exchange-traded fund: unlike an ordinary mutual fund it is bought and sold on the exchange at whatever price the market sets, so it has a traded price as well as a NAV.
| NSE symbol | QNIFTY |
|---|---|
| Tracks | — |
| Listed on NSE | 18 Jul 2008 |
| Market lot | 1 |
| Face value | ₹10.00 |
| How the symbol was matched | Matched to an NSE symbol by ISIN
on ISIN INF082J01499, the only identifier AMFI and NSE both publish |
Premium and discount are a measurement, not a verdict. An ETF has two prices on the same day: the NAV its fund house declares, and the price it actually traded at on NSE. This page shows the gap between them, computed as (traded close − NAV) ÷ NAV. A premium does not mean the fund is expensive and a discount does not mean it is cheap — persistent gaps usually reflect how and when the NAV itself is struck, not a mispricing anyone can act on. StockProof does not rank ETFs, score them, or recommend buying, selling or holding any of them.
Every figure here pairs a traded price with the NAV for THE SAME DATE, and days where only one of the two exists are excluded rather than filled in. That is why the paired-day count below can be lower than either the price history or the NAV history on its own. Comparing one day's price against another day's NAV would report that day's market movement as a premium — on a day the market moved 1.5%, it would invent a 1.5% premium that never existed.
A wide, persistent gap is usually about NAV timing rather than the market. An ETF holding overseas assets has its NAV struck from a foreign close that happens after Indian trading ends, so its traded price reflects newer information than the NAV it is compared against here. A debt ETF's NAV is struck on valuation-agency matrix prices that no one necessarily transacted at. Gold and silver ETF NAVs follow a domestic reference rate. In each case the two numbers are measured differently, and the difference between them is not evidence that either one is wrong.
A closing price is only as meaningful as the trading behind it. Many Indian ETFs trade in very small volumes, where the day's close can be a single small trade rather than a price the market cleared at, and a large premium on a nearly untraded day is mostly noise. Traded quantity is shown beside every figure so a gap measured on thin volume is visibly not the same fact as one measured on heavy volume. On a day an ETF did not trade at all, no premium is computed.
Market prices here are NSE's own end-of-day bhavcopy closes, never restated for corporate actions — unlike the price history on StockProof's company pages, which is adjusted. That is deliberate: AMFI never restates a published NAV either, so comparing an adjusted price against an unadjusted NAV would show a growing artificial discount on every ETF that has ever made a payout.
Premium / discount to NAV
Computed as (traded close − NAV) ÷ NAV, on the 749 days where both a traded price and a NAV exist for the same date — out of 759 days of stored prices and 752 days of stored NAV.
| Latest (22 Sep 2026) | +0.21% above NAV — within 0.5% of NAV |
|---|---|
| traded close | ₹257.60 |
| NAV that day | ₹257.0644 |
| units traded | 5541 |
| Mean over the paired days | -0.034% |
| Median | +0.071% |
| Range | -89.97% to +6.03% |
| Days above / below NAV | 617 above, 132 below |
| Furthest from NAV | -89.97% on 13 Feb 2026
₹279.27 against a NAV of ₹2784.6135, on 7562 units traded |
Over time
Zero is the NAV. A point above the line means the ETF traded above its NAV that day, below means under. Days with no trade, or no NAV, are absent rather than interpolated.
Most recent paired days
| Date | Traded close | NAV | Premium / discount | Units traded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Sep 2026 | ₹257.60 | ₹257.0644 | +0.208% above | 5541 |
| 21 Sep 2026 | ₹258.50 | ₹258.0049 | +0.192% above | 5809 |
| 18 Sep 2026 | ₹257.62 | ₹257.2585 | +0.141% above | 1691 |
| 17 Sep 2026 | ₹257.24 | ₹256.4245 | +0.318% above | 11686 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | ₹256.39 | ₹255.8416 | +0.214% above | 2924 |
| 11 Sep 2026 | ₹258.90 | ₹257.8327 | +0.414% above | 2099 |
| 10 Sep 2026 | ₹258.22 | ₹258.7107 | -0.190% below | 2028 |
| 09 Sep 2026 | ₹258.85 | ₹258.2013 | +0.251% above | 6728 |
| 08 Sep 2026 | ₹261.76 | ₹260.4445 | +0.505% above | 5892 |
| 07 Sep 2026 | ₹262.18 | ₹262.0320 | +0.056% above | 5242 |
| 04 Sep 2026 | ₹264.15 | ₹263.3400 | +0.308% above | 2823 |
| 03 Sep 2026 | ₹263.65 | ₹263.0337 | +0.234% above | 1075 |
| 28 Aug 2026 | ₹266.31 | ₹266.3261 | -0.006% below | 1049 |
| 27 Aug 2026 | ₹266.19 | ₹265.3931 | +0.300% above | 10992 |
| 26 Aug 2026 | ₹267.48 | ₹266.6809 | +0.300% above | 3296 |
| 25 Aug 2026 | ₹267.49 | ₹268.0788 | -0.220% below | 2124 |
| 24 Aug 2026 | ₹266.59 | ₹266.8087 | -0.082% below | 5888 |
| 21 Aug 2026 | ₹267.28 | ₹267.1730 | +0.040% above | 3381 |
| 20 Aug 2026 | ₹267.00 | ₹266.9524 | +0.018% above | 4258 |
| 19 Aug 2026 | ₹265.20 | ₹265.2632 | -0.024% below | 721 |
Returns (CAGR)
Compound annual growth of NAV over each trailing window, computed from stored history with the same function the company pages use. A window is only shown as a number when the stored history genuinely reaches back that far — it is never computed over a shorter span and labelled as the longer one.
| Window | CAGR | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year | Withheld | Return withheld: a large NAV discontinuity on 16 Feb 2026 is consistent with a suspected unit change in the published series. |
| 3-year | Withheld | Return withheld: a large NAV discontinuity on 16 Feb 2026 is consistent with a suspected unit change in the published series. |
| 5-year | N/A | Stored NAV history starts 01 Sep 2023, which does not reach back a full 5 years from 22 Sep 2026. |
| 10-year | N/A | Stored NAV history starts 01 Sep 2023, which does not reach back a full 10 years from 22 Sep 2026. |
| Since stored history begins | Withheld | Return withheld: a large NAV discontinuity on 16 Feb 2026 is consistent with a suspected unit change in the published series. |
"Since stored history begins" is deliberately not called "since inception" — AMFI publishes no NAV before 1 April 2006, so for an older fund its true inception NAV is not in any public AMFI feed.
Holdings X-ray
Holdings are available for 8 fund houses, not all 52. AMFI does not publish holdings at all; each AMC publishes its own file in its own format at its own address, so every fund house is a separate integration. StockProof covers HDFC, SBI, Nippon India, ICICI Prudential, Tata, PPFAS, Aditya Birla Sun Life and Motilal Oswal — about 56% of industry assets and 2,596 live schemes. A fund from any other house shows no holdings section; that means StockProof does not fetch that house's file, not that the fund holds nothing.
Holdings are matched to companies by ISIN — the security's own permanent identifier, never by name — so a matched company is the security the fund disclosed and not a guess. The FUND itself is matched to this page by NAME, which is weaker: measured 2026-08-30 across 625 portfolios, that name match succeeds for about 91% of funds, because the AMC's file carries no AMFI scheme code. A fund with no match simply shows no holdings section rather than another fund's. One disclosed portfolio also covers every plan and option of a fund at once, since that is the granularity the fund house publishes at.
Holdings are not available for this fund house. StockProof fetches monthly portfolio files from eight fund houses (listed above); this scheme belongs to another one, so there is nothing to show — not an empty portfolio.
Active share & tracking error
Active share (Cremers & Petajisto, 2009) is half the sum of the absolute difference between this fund's disclosed weight and the benchmark proxy's disclosed weight, security by security. Tracking error (Roll, 1992) is the annualized standard deviation of the daily difference between this fund's return and the proxy's, over the days both have a stored NAV. Neither is a rating or a score; both describe how much this fund's actual holdings and returns differ from a portfolio that simply held the benchmark.
StockProof has no official total-return index (TRI) data — the price feed it stores tracks an index's PRICE only, which understates a real TRI benchmark by roughly its dividend yield. Instead, both figures are computed against another fund: an index fund that tracks the same benchmark, whose own NAV already reflects reinvested dividends and whose own disclosed portfolio stands in for the benchmark's constituent weights. Measured directly: two different index funds on the same benchmark differ from each other by only 2–3 basis points a year of tracking error — two orders of magnitude below any actively managed fund's real figure — which is what licenses using one as a stand-in for the true benchmark. This proxy is hand-picked and verified for 24 declared benchmarks; a fund benchmarked to anything else shows no active share or tracking error, not a guessed one.
Tracking error is computed over whatever NAV history both funds actually share, which is genuinely short — AMFI's history file starts no earlier than April 2006, but the DEPTH stored here reaches back only to around September 2023, roughly three years, well short of the five-year-plus history stock pages elsewhere on this site commonly show. The exact window and day count are shown beside every figure so it is never mistaken for a longer, more settled estimate.
Higher active share means this fund's holdings differ more from the benchmark proxy; lower means they resemble it more closely. Neither direction is automatically better or worse — it depends on what the fund is being held for and whether that difference is deliberate stock-picking or an accident of the universe boundary this data can see. The same is true of tracking error: a fund built to closely track its benchmark should show a low one, while a genuinely active fund is expected to show a higher one by design. This is descriptive, not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything, and nothing on this page ranks or scores funds against each other.
A single day whose NAV changes by an implausible amount — almost always an unrecorded corporate action such as a unit split, not a real market move — is detected and the whole tracking-error figure is withheld for that fund rather than shown corrupted by one bad day. Active share is unaffected by this check: it comes from the fund houses' own disclosed portfolios, not from NAV history.
Benchmark proxy: Motilal Oswal Nifty 50 Index Fund — a Tier-1 index fund tracking Nifty 50 TRI, standing in for the benchmark itself (see the note above on why).
| Active share | N/A | this fund's own holdings are not on file |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error (annualized) | N/A | a single-day NAV change past 35% was found around 2026-02-16 — consistent with a suspected unrecorded corporate action (such as a unit change), so tracking error is not shown rather than computed on a corrupted day |