Skip to content
MarketDeck StockProof
LGEINDIA.NS

Trace Score

LG Electronics India Ltd. · Consumer Durables

Not enough data

Only 1 of 4 components could be computed from the data on file; a Trace Score needs at least 2.

A description of what's already in these four filed signals, not a rating, recommendation, or forecast. Each component below is computed and cited exactly where it already lives in the app — this page only combines them, with equal weight per component.

Fundamentals Momentum

N/A

not included in the composite

Needs at least 2 stored annual years; only 1 on file.

See the Piotroski criteria ↗

Growth Consistency

N/A

not included in the composite

Neither Revenue nor Net Profit CAGR was computable over the stored history.

See it on LGEINDIA.NS's detail page ↗

Earnings Quality

N/A

not included in the composite

Needs net profit and CFO for 3+ stored years; only 1 on file.

See it on LGEINDIA.NS's detail page ↗

Sector Standing

89/ 100

3 / 3 inputs available

Mean sector percentile across ROE, ROCE, Debt/Equity (3 of 3 available).

See it on LGEINDIA.NS's detail page ↗

On which score fits this company

This company's price-to-book ratio is 14.7, which places it in the lowest fifth of book-to-market values in the Nifty 500 — the range academic work labels growth.

The Piotroski F-Score above was developed and tested by Piotroski (2000) on high book-to-market (value) companies. Mohanram (2005) published a separate eight-signal score for low book-to-market (growth) companies, arguing that growth firms have different characteristics that call for different signals.

StockProof does not compute Mohanram's score: two of its eight signals require research-and-development and advertising expenditure, and neither figure is published in NSE's XBRL filings for this market.

This note reports a published methodological distinction. It is not an assessment of this company, is not a view on whether the F-Score is reliable here, and is not a recommendation.

How this is combined

The composite is the equal-weighted mean of whichever of the four components could be computed — never a fixed denominator, so an unavailable component re-weights the rest rather than counting as zero (the same principle Piotroski uses among its own criteria). A minimum of 2 of 4 components must be computable before any number is shown at all. Equal weight is per component, not per underlying criterion: Piotroski's 9 sub-criteria versus Growth's 2 is an accident of an external methodology, not a StockProof judgement about relative importance. Margin Trend and ROCE Trajectory are shown on the detail page but excluded here (they restate what Piotroski's own criteria already test); P/E is excluded as a valuation signal, not a quality one.