P/E
P/E = Price / EPS
P/E = Price / (ProfitLossForPeriod / PaidUpValueOfEquityShareCapital ÷ FaceValueOfEquityShareCapital) → ₹2,399.70 / (₹7,479,344,000 / 114,552,000 shares) = ₹2,399.70 / ₹65.29 EPS
1M window · 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-22
Price is the daily close from stored Kite history. The other metrics pair that daily price with the company's periodic filings — each fundamental (revenue, EPS, equity…) is held flat at its latest filed value between annual filings, so a ratio steps at each filing and moves daily only through its price term. A metric with no input on file for this company (e.g. EV/EBITDA for a bank, which has no EBIT) is shown as unavailable, never guessed. Share-count-based metrics use the latest diluted share count against split/bonus-adjusted prices.
Same window as the price chart above
These reflect only the stock's recent price and volume behavior — not the company's fundamentals — and are not a recommendation to buy or sell. Standard published parameters are used throughout (see each chart's own label); a company with too little stored price history for a given indicator's lookback window shows that plainly below rather than a garbage or misleading value.
MACD (12,26,9), Stochastic Oscillator (14,3) and Money Flow Index (14-day) each carry their own published reference lines/bands (20/80 for the oscillator readings) where one is standard. ADX includes +DI/-DI for direction alongside trend strength; a dashed line marks the commonly published 25 "trending market" reading. ATR is shown in raw rupees here; the price/volume preset screen (below, and on the Screener page) reports it as a % of price so it's comparable across stocks at different price levels. Computed from the same stored daily OHLCV history as the price chart above — no new data source.
Calculated from this company's filed figures, and from the current price where a ratio needs one. Every ratio shows its source trace: the filed elements it reads and the arithmetic behind the result.
P/E = Price / EPS
P/E = Price / (ProfitLossForPeriod / PaidUpValueOfEquityShareCapital ÷ FaceValueOfEquityShareCapital) → ₹2,399.70 / (₹7,479,344,000 / 114,552,000 shares) = ₹2,399.70 / ₹65.29 EPS
ROE = Net Income / Shareholder Equity
ROE = ProfitLossForPeriod / EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent → ₹7,479,344,000 / ₹26,261,172,000 = 28.48%
Debt/Equity = Total Debt / Shareholder Equity
Debt/Equity = BorrowingsCurrent + BorrowingsNoncurrent / EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent → ₹0 / ₹26,261,172,000 = 0.00
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Ratio = CurrentAssets / CurrentLiabilities → ₹96,965,999,000 / ₹78,592,765,000 = 1.23
ROCE = EBIT / (Shareholder Equity + Total Debt)
ROCE = ProfitBeforeExceptionalItemsAndTax + FinanceCosts / (EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent + BorrowingsCurrent + BorrowingsNoncurrent) → ₹10,208,128,000 / (₹26,261,172,000 + ₹0) = 38.87%
Dividend Yield = (Dividends Paid / Diluted Shares Outstanding) / Price
Qualification This is cash paid during the fiscal year, not a per-share rate declared for it (no such element exists in the filing data) — timing can straddle interim/final dividends across years, and pre-FY2020-21 figures may include the since-abolished Dividend Distribution Tax, reading higher than later years for that reason alone.
Dividend Yield = (|DividendsPaidClassifiedAsFinancingActivities| / PaidUpValueOfEquityShareCapital ÷ FaceValueOfEquityShareCapital) / Price → (₹2,039,026,000 / 114,552,000 shares) / ₹2,399.70 = ₹17.80 / ₹2,399.70
Computed from this company's stored annual filings. Each figure carries the filed values behind it as a tooltip.
Net profit or operating cash flow was zero or negative in the base or latest year — a growth-rate comparison isn't defined across a sign change.
Eight year-over-year accounting indices (Beneish, 1999) computed for Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd. across its two most recently stored annual filings. Read the disclosures below before anything past this paragraph.
This is not an accusation and not a finding that any manipulation occurred. Beneish's own paper is explicit that the score identifies companies whose accounting CHARACTERISTICS resemble those of a sample of past manipulators -- nothing more. StockProof never labels a company "manipulator", "red flag" or "suspicious", and never shows any list of companies ordered by this score. The eight components below -- factual statements about figures the company itself filed -- always come before the composite number, which is the inference, not the fact.
The M-Score is calibrated on 74 US-listed companies from 1982-1992 later found to have manipulated earnings (Beneish, M. D. (1999), "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation", Financial Analysts Journal 55(5)) -- not on any Indian company or era. Measured on StockProof's own Nifty 500 universe as of 2026-09-02, 13.6% of companies score above Beneish's own published cutoff. On any realistic base rate of actual earnings manipulation, that flag rate is overwhelmingly false positives, not overwhelmingly real ones.
No "Selling, General & Administrative Expense" element exists anywhere in NSE's filed data. The SGAI component below is approximated as Employee Benefit Expense + Other Expenses, divided by revenue -- a reasonable stand-in for a manufacturer, but for a services company this proxy is closer to the entire cost base than to SG&A specifically. This is disclosed because it is a genuine deviation from Beneish's published specification; its coefficient (-0.172) is the smallest of the eight, which bounds how far the approximation can move the composite.
This measures something different from a financial-distress score like Altman's Z-Score, and the two essentially never agree. Measured on StockProof's own 389-company overlap as of 2026-09-02: only 5 companies were flagged by both, an agreement rate (intersection ÷ union) of 6.2%, and a correlation between the two scores of +0.088 -- closely matching the independently measured +0.092 over 3,242 Malaysian-listed companies. A low Z-Score and a high M-Score are not corroborating each other; they are unrelated measurements.
Comparing FY2024-25 → FY2025-26
| Index | Value | Beneish's own threshold | Reading, vs. that threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSRI — Days' Sales in Receivables Index | 3.411 | 1.031 | Exceeds Beneish's published threshold |
| GMI — Gross Margin Index | 0.722 | 1.014 | Below Beneish's published threshold |
| AQI — Asset Quality Index | 1.126 | 1.039 | Exceeds Beneish's published threshold |
| SGI — Sales Growth Index | 1.380 | 1.134 | Exceeds Beneish's published threshold |
| DEPI — Depreciation Index | 0.972 | 1.077 | Below Beneish's published threshold |
| SGAI — SG&A Index | 1.391 | 1.041 | Exceeds Beneish's published threshold |
| LVGI — Leverage Index | 0.939 | 1.111 | Below Beneish's published threshold |
| TATA — Total Accruals to Total Assets | 0.098 | 0.018 | Exceeds Beneish's published threshold |
This is a reading against a published statistical model, not a finding and not a verdict on this company -- see the disclosures above, especially how this compares to a general population's own measured false-positive rate.
10 stored quarters
| Metric (to shareholders basis) | Q4 FY2023-24 | Q1 FY2024-25 | Q2 FY2024-25 | Q3 FY2024-25 | Q4 FY2024-25 | Q1 FY2025-26 | Q2 FY2025-26 | Q3 FY2025-26 | Q4 FY2025-26 | Q1 FY2026-27 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,015.73 Cr. | ₹1,009.72 Cr. | ₹1,152.92 Cr. | ₹1,271.01 Cr. | ₹1,642.04 Cr. | ₹1,309.87 Cr. | ₹1,677.38 Cr. | ₹1,895.69 Cr. | ₹2,119.21 Cr. | ₹1,814.62 Cr. | RevenueFromOperations |
| Net Profit | ₹111.60 Cr. | ₹87.19 Cr. | ₹97.77 Cr. | ₹98.19 Cr. | ₹244.25 Cr. | ₹120.18 Cr. | ₹153.79 Cr. | ₹170.77 Cr. | ₹303.20 Cr. | ₹172.84 Cr. | ProfitLossForPeriod |
Primary figures are Revenue from Operations and Net Profit attributable to shareholders — the basis the ratios use. Where they differ, the companion Gross revenue (incl. inter-segment) and incl. minority net profit (the totals a news headline usually quotes) are shown beneath, each traceable to its own XBRL element. Quarters shown are however many are actually stored (up to 10).
Latest filing Jun 2026 · 12 filings on file
| Metric | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter & Promoter Group | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% | 74.50% |
| Public | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% | 25.50% |
| Employee Trusts | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Promoter vs. public shareholding, from NSE's own quarterly shareholding-pattern filings. This is the headline promoter/public split only — a further breakdown by FII/DII/mutual fund holders requires each filing's own detailed disclosure and isn't shown here.
20 trading days shown
| Date | Traded Qty | Delivery Qty | Delivery % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | 584333 | 108986 | 18.65% |
| 2026-09-21 | 180334 | 77550 | 43.00% |
| 2026-09-18 | 531793 | 229286 | 43.12% |
| 2026-09-17 | 269660 | 80540 | 29.87% |
| 2026-09-16 | 428399 | 143823 | 33.57% |
| 2026-09-15 | 270785 | 133895 | 49.45% |
| 2026-09-11 | 460144 | 154629 | 39.49% |
| 2026-09-10 | 370821 | 159594 | 43.04% |
| 2026-09-09 | 237008 | 108084 | 45.60% |
| 2026-09-08 | 348575 | 98570 | 28.28% |
| 2026-09-07 | 215499 | 92688 | 43.01% |
| 2026-09-04 | 299818 | 101731 | 33.93% |
| 2026-09-03 | 270890 | 73711 | 27.21% |
| 2026-09-02 | 273379 | 117200 | 42.87% |
| 2026-09-01 | 327932 | 124600 | 38.00% |
| 2026-08-31 | 393623 | 173921 | 44.18% |
| 2026-08-28 | 199226 | 98341 | 49.36% |
| 2026-08-27 | 384851 | 128872 | 33.49% |
| 2026-08-26 | 737510 | 239330 | 32.45% |
| 2026-08-25 | 344854 | 96856 | 28.09% |
Delivery quantity/percentage from the NSE bhavcopy (DELIV_QTY/DELIV_PER) — the share of that day's traded volume that actually settled into a demat account, rather than being squared off intraday. A higher delivery percentage is commonly read as genuine accumulation/distribution rather than speculative same-day trading; this describes recent trading PATTERN, not the company itself, and is not a recommendation to buy or sell. A blank cell is a day NSE itself published no figure for, never a zero.
No insider-trading disclosures on file. That may mean none have been fetched yet, or that NSE has genuinely published none for this company.
FY2025-26 · Annual filing
The raw filing line items behind the figures on this page, and NSE's own filing document where NSE publishes one.
View original filing on NSE ↗ NSE's own filing document, opened in a new tab — StockProof links to it, never stores a copy.
| Line item | Filed value |
|---|---|
| ProfitLossForPeriod | 7479344000.0 |
| PaidUpValueOfEquityShareCapital ÷ FaceValueOfEquityShareCapital | 114552000.0 |
View original filing on NSE ↗ NSE's own filing document, opened in a new tab — StockProof links to it, never stores a copy.
| Line item | Filed value |
|---|---|
| CurrentAssets | 96965999000.0 |
| CurrentLiabilities | 78592765000.0 |
| EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent | 26261172000.0 |
| BorrowingsCurrent + BorrowingsNoncurrent | — |
One MarketDeck account across StockProof, Charting and F&O.
Continue with MarketDeck Create account