Trace Score
Supreme Petrochem Ltd. · Chemicals
Computed from 4 of 4 components.
A description of what's already in these four filed signals, not a rating, recommendation, or forecast. Each component below is computed and cited exactly where it already lives in the app — this page only combines them, with equal weight per component.
Fundamentals Momentum
5 / 9 met
5 of 9 computable Piotroski criteria met (9 of 9 total computable).
Growth Consistency
1 / 2 met
1 of 2 growth checks positive (5y or best available shorter span).
Earnings Quality
1 / 1 met
No persistent profit/cash gap detected.
Sector Standing
3 / 3 inputs available
Mean sector percentile across ROE, ROCE, Debt/Equity (3 of 3 available).
This company's price-to-book ratio is 6.8, which places it in the middle of the book-to-market distribution in the Nifty 500 — in neither the lowest fifth (the range academic work labels growth) nor the highest fifth (the range academic work labels value) that this published distinction is about.
The Piotroski F-Score above was developed and tested by Piotroski (2000) on high book-to-market (value) companies. Mohanram (2005) published a separate eight-signal score for low book-to-market (growth) companies, arguing that growth firms have different characteristics that call for different signals.
StockProof does not compute Mohanram's score: two of its eight signals require research-and-development and advertising expenditure, and neither figure is published in NSE's XBRL filings for this market.
This note reports a published methodological distinction. It is not an assessment of this company, is not a view on whether the F-Score is reliable here, and is not a recommendation.
The composite is the equal-weighted mean of whichever of the four components could be computed — never a fixed denominator, so an unavailable component re-weights the rest rather than counting as zero (the same principle Piotroski uses among its own criteria). A minimum of 2 of 4 components must be computable before any number is shown at all. Equal weight is per component, not per underlying criterion: Piotroski's 9 sub-criteria versus Growth's 2 is an accident of an external methodology, not a StockProof judgement about relative importance. Margin Trend and ROCE Trajectory are shown on the detail page but excluded here (they restate what Piotroski's own criteria already test); P/E is excluded as a valuation signal, not a quality one.